poll: PRs older than three years

Paul Richard Thomas paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 17:06:00 GMT 2009


Dear All,

>  PR20520 - allocatable arrays used uninitialized without a warning
>  Plenty of dupes, marked as 'accepts-invalid' although it's mainly a user
>  error. Leave as is?

Yes indeed.


>  PR21881 - ICE for overly large arrays
>  Is this something that could/should be fixed while changing the array
>  descriptors?

Yes - leave it.

>
>  PR22210 - ...
>  Could someone try to figure out if this is still an issue?

Maybe Andrew could answer that?   :-)

>
>  PR22552 - feature request: additional warning
>  Do we really need this? It's probably not much work, but within 3.5 years,
>  nobody thought it worth his time enough to do it to the end.
>  Close as WONTFIX?

A patch was posted for this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-04/msg00148.html

>
>  PR23169 - INTENT not passed on for to optimizer
>  The more I look into the, the more confused I am. No idea.
>

Note comment #5
A C equivalent test case "works".  Once the infamous
multiple-decls-per-function issue in gfortran is fixed, this bug probably will
disappear.

Does it?

>  PR24878 - sub. getting called as a funct. if passed as actual argument
>  It was stated in 2005 by Andrew that few if any other compiler catch this.
>  Close as WONTFIX?

Does -fwhole-file detect it?  It should... I think! (I am not in a
position to check right now)

Cheers

Paul



More information about the Fortran mailing list