poll: PRs older than three years
Paul Richard Thomas
paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 17:06:00 GMT 2009
Dear All,
> PR20520 - allocatable arrays used uninitialized without a warning
> Plenty of dupes, marked as 'accepts-invalid' although it's mainly a user
> error. Leave as is?
Yes indeed.
> PR21881 - ICE for overly large arrays
> Is this something that could/should be fixed while changing the array
> descriptors?
Yes - leave it.
>
> PR22210 - ...
> Could someone try to figure out if this is still an issue?
Maybe Andrew could answer that? :-)
>
> PR22552 - feature request: additional warning
> Do we really need this? It's probably not much work, but within 3.5 years,
> nobody thought it worth his time enough to do it to the end.
> Close as WONTFIX?
A patch was posted for this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-04/msg00148.html
>
> PR23169 - INTENT not passed on for to optimizer
> The more I look into the, the more confused I am. No idea.
>
Note comment #5
A C equivalent test case "works". Once the infamous
multiple-decls-per-function issue in gfortran is fixed, this bug probably will
disappear.
Does it?
> PR24878 - sub. getting called as a funct. if passed as actual argument
> It was stated in 2005 by Andrew that few if any other compiler catch this.
> Close as WONTFIX?
Does -fwhole-file detect it? It should... I think! (I am not in a
position to check right now)
Cheers
Paul
More information about the Fortran
mailing list