[patch, libfortran] Fix run-time checking of ORDER to RESHAPE

Tobias Burnus burnus@net-b.de
Sun Sep 7 11:05:00 GMT 2008


Thomas Koenig wrote:
> The number of test cases came about because I wanted to
> test each error message for the reshape_generic.c and m4 versions.
> I've become cautious :-)
>   
:-)

> Regression-tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.  OK for trunk?
>   
OK. Thanks for the patch.

Tobias

> 2008-09-07  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> 	PR fortran/37203
> 	* intrinsics/reshape_generic.c:  Add checking on
> 	out-of-bounds and duplicate values of order argument.
> 	* m4/reshape.m4:  Likewise.
> 	* generated/reshape_c10.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_c16.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_c4.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_c8.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_i16.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_i4.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_i8.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_r10.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_r16.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_r4.c: Regenerated.
> 	* generated/reshape_r8.c: Regenerated.
>
> 2008-09-07  Thomas Koenig  <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> 	PR fortran/37203
> 	* gfortran.d/reshape_order_1.f90:  New test case.
> 	* gfortran.d/reshape_order_2.f90:  New test case.
> 	* gfortran.d/reshape_order_3.f90:  New test case.
> 	* gfortran.d/reshape_order_4.f90:  New test case.
>
>   



More information about the Fortran mailing list