[patch, libfortran] Fix run-time checking of ORDER to RESHAPE
Tobias Burnus
burnus@net-b.de
Sun Sep 7 11:05:00 GMT 2008
Thomas Koenig wrote:
> The number of test cases came about because I wanted to
> test each error message for the reshape_generic.c and m4 versions.
> I've become cautious :-)
>
:-)
> Regression-tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu. OK for trunk?
>
OK. Thanks for the patch.
Tobias
> 2008-09-07 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR fortran/37203
> * intrinsics/reshape_generic.c: Add checking on
> out-of-bounds and duplicate values of order argument.
> * m4/reshape.m4: Likewise.
> * generated/reshape_c10.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_c16.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_c4.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_c8.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_i16.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_i4.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_i8.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_r10.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_r16.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_r4.c: Regenerated.
> * generated/reshape_r8.c: Regenerated.
>
> 2008-09-07 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> PR fortran/37203
> * gfortran.d/reshape_order_1.f90: New test case.
> * gfortran.d/reshape_order_2.f90: New test case.
> * gfortran.d/reshape_order_3.f90: New test case.
> * gfortran.d/reshape_order_4.f90: New test case.
>
>
More information about the Fortran
mailing list