new proposal to vector intrinsics
Sa Liu
SALIU@de.ibm.com
Fri Jan 18 18:09:00 GMT 2008
Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de> wrote on 15.01.2008 11:50:33:
> As written, I would prefer something like the following (ignoring "kind"
> for the moment). And I also do not see how xlf plans to handle the
> reverse: vector -> integer/real array (except of EQUIVALENCE).
I agree with the mechanism of using assignment interface. And I've got the
agreement from xlf, that they will provide the same interface as example
for users to make use of. By this means we could keep the compatibility of
data initialization and assignment.
How about the changes in frontend concerning recognition of backend
builtins? Will this be acceptable in gfotran?
Thanks!
Sa
More information about the Fortran
mailing list