[RFC] [Ping] Comments on gfortran manual

[Mikael Morin]

Hi,

thanks for it.
My comments follow.
It would be nice to answer the questions asked in your XXX comments
before committing (apart the last one).

About signal, I found no example in the testsuite.
About -fno-dump-core, I don't know either
About -fdefault-*-8, It's being already discussed in Dominique's thread
:(

Mikael

> The long history of the Fortran language, its wide use and broad
> userbase, the large number of different compiler vendors and the lack >of
> some features crucial to users in the first standards have lead to the
>-existence of an important number of extensions to the language. While
>+existence of a number of important extensions to the language.  While
I think the original version is better


>-Fortran compiler, not all existing extensions are supported. This >section
>+Fortran compiler, not all existing extensions are supported.  This
>section
> aims at listing these extensions and offering advice on how best make
> code that uses them running with the GNU Fortran compiler.
Is this needed by the texi format?

>+@c XXX: Document -Wextra
>+
s/XXX/TODO/ ?

>+@code{EPSILON(X)} returns returns the smallest number @var{E} of the
>same kind
>+as @var{X} such that @math{1 + E > 1}.
s/returns returns/returns/