[PATCH, fortran] Interoperability with C int128_t types
Bernhard Fischer
rep.dot.nop@gmail.com
Tue Apr 15 12:04:00 GMT 2008
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:45:32AM +0200, Sa Liu wrote:
>Sorry for the late response. How about this patch?
>On platforms that do not support 128-bit integer, it will behave the same
>as if -std=f2003 is given.
>The patch has been regtested on spu-linux.
>
>Thanks!
>Sa
>Index: gcc/gcc/fortran/iso-c-binding.def
>===================================================================
>--- gcc.orig/gcc/fortran/iso-c-binding.def
>+++ gcc/gcc/fortran/iso-c-binding.def
>@@ -42,44 +42,57 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
> /* The arguments to NAMED_*CST are:
> -- an internal name
> -- the symbol name in the module, as seen by Fortran code
>- -- the value it has, for use in trans-types.c */
>+ -- the value it has, for use in trans-types.c
>+ -- the standard that support this type */
I'm not a native speaker, but i think this should either read
"the standards that support" or "the standard that supports".
To me, the former sounds more accurate iff we or several standards
together (in the future).
The same applies to the other occurances in this proposed patch (which i
stopped reading here).
More information about the Fortran
mailing list