[PATCH, Fortran] PROCEDURE declarations
Tobias Schlüter
tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de
Sun Sep 2 17:20:00 GMT 2007
Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Tobias Schlüter wrote:
>> There are two quite different kinds of PROCEDURE statements: the form
>> with parentheses (R445, R451 and R1211) and the one without (R1206).
>> The former is akin to a a data declaration statement, the latter to a
>> MODULE PROCEDURE statement.
>
> Agreed, except for R451 which differs from both:
>
> R451 specific-binding is PROCEDURE [ (interface-name) ]
> [ [ , binding-attr -list ] :: ]
> binding-name [ => procedure-name ]
Woops, indeed, thanks for pointing this out.
> But we can start worrying about this when we start implementing it.
Agreed.
>> I think that's fine. I would like this message and the one from above
>> to use a similar message, but I'm convinced that you'll find a
>> pleasant color for this particular bikeshed.
> Given the grey, rainy day I suggest blue and yellow.
Hey it's not raining over here! Even if it were, the argument fails as
nobody would use their bike on a rainy day! :)
>> That depends on what information one keeps in the parsing stage :-)
>> But this change is definitely beyond the scope of your current patch,
>> and can be addressed whenever someone feels the urge (i.e. never :-).
> If this should be really fixed, I suggest to fill a PR - otherwise we
> will forget about it.
It's only important if somebody touches the code, so I don't think it
warrants a PR.
Cheers,
- Tobi
More information about the Fortran
mailing list