Cygwin testsuite failures

[Jerry DeLisle]

Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> The number of testsuite failures under Cygwin_NT is mounting.  The
>> chmod_x.f90 failures have been there for an age and arise because I do
>> or do not (I cannot remember which now) have the correct administrator
>> rights.  The rest have creapt in lately.
>>
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/chmod_1.f90 execution test
>> ...snip...
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/chmod_2.f90 execution test
>> ...snip...
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/chmod_3.f90 execution test
>> ...snip...
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/gamma_5.f90 execution test
>> ...snip...
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 execution test
>> Running /svn/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/gomp.exp ...
>> Running /svn/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect.exp ...
>> Running 
>> /svn/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/compile.exp ..
>> .
>> Running 
>> /svn/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/execute.exp ..
>> .
>> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_integer.f90 
>> execution,  -O0
>> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_integer.f90 
>> execution,  -O1
>> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_integer.f90 
>> execution,  -O2
>> FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_integer.f90 
>> execution,  -Os
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> gamma_5.f90 either needs to be updated if you don't have the latest or 
> xfailed.
> 
> I am getting nint_2.f90 and intrinsic_integer.f90 failure here as well.
> 
> Jerry
> 
The gamma_5.f90 failure is a segfault.  I can not get a useful backtrace with gdb.

I see there is no man entry for tgamma.  This system is using newlib, I suspect 
it is a newlib issue and we should xfail this and report upstream to newlib team.

Jerry