RFC: Renaming 'enum gfc_generic_isym_id'

[Daniel Franke]

On Monday 28 May 2007 18:42:04 Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:57:52AM +0200, Daniel Franke wrote:
> >  (1) rename 'enum gfc_generic_isym_id' to 'enum gfc_isym_id'
> >  (2) add missing intrinsics to 'enum gfc_isym_id'
> >  (3) add an additional 'id' argument to 'add_sym_[012345][s]'
> >  (4) change all callers, add the corresponding 'gfc_isym_id'
> >  (5) rename member 'generic_id' in 'struct gfc_intrinsic_sym' to 'id'
> >  (6) change all callers
> >
> > As especially (4) takes some time and effort I'd like to know whether
> > there are any objections to this, maybe an implication I missed?!
>
> Just for clarification.  You want to add, for example,
> GFC_ISYM_ABS, GFC_ISYM_CABS, GFC_ISYM_DABS, and GFC_ISYM_ZABS.
> Will this have any performance impact on the switch statements
> in trans-intrinsic.c

I didn't intent to. I want to add GFC_ISYMs for subroutines, e.g. 
GFC_ISYM_SLEEP. The generic aspect shall not be lost, i.e. any specific name 
of ABS shall still have an id of GFC_ISYM_ABS. 

Eventually, I want to switch over subroutines as it is done with functions in 
trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_function).