[patch, fortran] [4.2/4.3 Regression] PR32002, insufficient conformance check

[Daniel Franke]

On Monday 21 May 2007 01:20:26 Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > gcc/fortran:
> > 2005-05-20  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@verizon.net>
> >             Daniel Franke  <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
> >
> > 	PR fortran/32002
> > 	* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): Resolve actual argument after
> > 	being identified as variable.
> >
> >
> > gcc/testsuite:
> > 2005-05-20  Daniel Franke  <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
> >
> > 	PR fortran/32002
> > 	* gfortran.dg/pr32002.f90: New test.
> >
> >
> > Regression tested on ?-?-? by Jerry and on i686-pc-linux-gnu by myself.
> > Ok for 4.2 and trunk?
>
> Regression tested on x86-64-gnu-linux.  The test case needs a descriptive
> name and the error message at line 40 should be "different shape".
>
> OK for trunk.  OK for 4.2 only if this is a regression from 4.1


At first, many, many thanks to Jerry who came up with this fix after I dumped 
tons of little bits and pieces of information on him :)

Now, this is an regression to 4.1, an interesting one as well: while looking 
for a descriptive name, I found "compliant_elemental_intrinsics_1.f90", 
associated with PR26976. Exactly the same problem as shown in PR32002, the 
fix didn't cover all cases ...

Committed fix and compliant_elemental_intrinsics_2.f90 as r124924.

Regards
	Daniel