PATCH: Fix a comment typo in gfc_trans_do
FX Coudert
fxcoudert@gmail.com
Mon May 21 21:16:00 GMT 2007
Hi H. J.,
Can you try that patch? I strongly believe it might fix the
regression. If you confirm that it fixes it, I'll commit quickly as
obvious.
/me gives his "I'm so sorry" look
FX
Index: trans-stmt.c
===================================================================
--- trans-stmt.c (revision 124910)
+++ trans-stmt.c (working copy)
@@ -818,8 +818,8 @@ gfc_trans_simple_do (gfc_code * code, st
body;
cycle_label:
dovar += step
- countm1--;
if (countm1 ==0) goto exit_label;
+ countm1--;
}
exit_label:
@@ -947,6 +947,10 @@ gfc_trans_do (gfc_code * code)
gfc_add_expr_to_block (&body, tmp);
}
+ /* Increment the loop variable. */
+ tmp = build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type, dovar, step);
+ gfc_add_modify_expr (&body, dovar, tmp);
+
/* End with the loop condition. Loop until countm1 == 0. */
cond = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, countm1,
build_int_cst (utype, 0));
@@ -955,10 +959,6 @@ gfc_trans_do (gfc_code * code)
cond, tmp, build_empty_stmt ());
gfc_add_expr_to_block (&body, tmp);
- /* Increment the loop variable. */
- tmp = build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type, dovar, step);
- gfc_add_modify_expr (&body, dovar, tmp);
-
/* Decrement the loop count. */
tmp = build2 (MINUS_EXPR, utype, countm1, build_int_cst (utype, 1));
gfc_add_modify_expr (&body, countm1, tmp);
More information about the Fortran
mailing list