[fortran patch] Don't use TREE_LISTs for storing arguments to intrinsic functions

Steve Kargl sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Mon May 7 22:45:00 GMT 2007


On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:36:14PM -0700, Brooks Moses wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:20:15PM +0100, Lee Millward wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regression tested with no new failures on
> > i686-pc-linux-gnu, ok to apply?
> 
> Note to other maintainers: I've had a look at earlier versions of this
> patch, and I'm planning to give it a review later tonight -- since it's
> fairly long, I figured it would be useful to mention that to avoid
> duplication of effort.  Unless you want to, of course!  :)
> 
> Steve, any idea whether this is likely to affect your merge from the
> fortran-experiments branch?  I think it should be essentially
> independent, but I thought it would be good to ask, since I'm not
> familiar with where all the changes are on the branch.
> 

I briefly looked at the patch.  If there are any problems when I
merge trunk into the FE branch, it appears fairly straight forward
to fix.  If I can't fix the FE branch, I know your email address. :)

I was wondering what the benefit of this patch is?  Is this 
simply an attempt to bring gfortran's frontend into conformance
with other frontends?

-- 
Steve



More information about the Fortran mailing list