Testers needed for ISO C Binding patch

[Tobias Schlüter]

Steve Kargl wrote:
>> I'll try fixing this later tonight by following the testsuite manual's 
>> recommendation of not including system headers, but instead writing the 
>> required prototypes explicitly.
> 
> Never seen that one either :-\

Fixed in the described fashion.  Committed to the branch.  I'm still 
waiting for the testsuite to finish, but it looks like I'm getting a 
clean run with this fix.

>> I couldn't see a ChangeLog on the fortran-experiments branch, where's it?
>>
> 
> There is ChangeLog.isocbinding that documents the changes since the
> original branching (with the possible exception of svnmerges).  FX's
> first entry is
> 
> 2006-12-18  FX
> 
> 	* plenty of files: Initial commit of Christopher's patch,
> 	slightly reworked by me.
>   
> You'll note a lack of proper ChangeLog entry in that Chris has been
> working on this patch for what must be approaching 2 years.  Detailing
> all of the changes would probably have given FX a stroke.

That's certain, I'm somewhat worried about clause 2a of the GPL:
"You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating 
that you changed the files and the date of any change."

But with no means to reconstruct when which changes happened, we can 
probably think of the branch merge date as the modification date?

- Tobi