gfortran links to bug lists
Jerry DeLisle
jvdelisle@verizon.net
Thu Jul 19 01:59:00 GMT 2007
Paul Thomas wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> When I made the links to specific categories of bugs on the gfortran
> wiki, I was trying to point out that we are still a ways from having a
> fully satisfactory F95 compiler - admittedly, the bugs are getting to be
> increasingly obscure but our aim should surely be to make as good an F95
> compiler as we can before moving on to F2003.
>
> I find it a bit concerning that the focus has shifted so far to F2003
> that I have had to resurrect my own Bugzilla lists. Is this really what
> we want to be doing right now? If so, OK, I'll plough my own furrow but
> I'd rather that we all pulled together.
I agree we need to focus on the bug list.
>
> I am as keen as the next to get serious F2003 features into gfortran.
> In fact, I have ideas about how to proceed on many of them, and have
> even done some fairly serious experiments on them - eg. the ABSTRACT
> INTERFACE and PROCEDURE patch. However, I do think that we should walk
> before we run. I am struck that Tobi Schlueter and I were talking
> character bugs two years ago and that I am still struggling, after all
> this time, with a very big character patch.
>
> I was very disappointed at the complete lack of interest in revamping
> the parser to carry out some fairly fundamental inprovements to
> gfortran. Whilst we are doing OKish on Polyhedron execution tests, we
> are still not scoring very well on diagnostics and module usage is
> woefully slow. (Try to get your heads around F2003 classes without
> sorting this out.)
I will work with you on this.
>
> What do you all think? Am I wasting my energy or are others also
> committed to a systematic development of gfortran?
>
I don't have many words to offer here. All I know is that I am focusing on the
bugs that I can. Obviously iso-c-binding needs to get squared away. Character
related stuff is obvious, diagnostics, and initialization issues.
Maybe we should take a month and focus a few of us on one area and see what we
can do. I am OK with that.
Jerry
More information about the Fortran
mailing list