Problem compiling NONMEM with mingw gfortran 4.3.0 builds
Jerry DeLisle
jvdelisle@verizon.net
Wed Jul 18 04:13:00 GMT 2007
Steve Chapel wrote:
> FX Coudert wrote:
>>> We could use official or semi-official builds of stable releases for
>>> production, especially if those releases were well-known and used by
>>> many users. I actually tried DJGPP builds of gfortran first, but ran
>>> into the 127 character command line limit. One of my problems with
>>> MinGW builds is that there are so few pre-built binaries for Windows,
>>> and they don't seem to be very well known. I think the MinGW could
>>> benefit users by providing pre-built binaries as DJGPP does, and
>>> those users could in turn help MinGW by providing more extensive
>>> testing of the releases.
>>
>> I don't quite understand what you mean here. MinGW (the project) has
>> many binaries available for download, and they actually are quite
>> conservative with respect to the software they package, I think. So,
>> they do have well-known, stable binaries in my opinion. In fact,
>> they're actually to stable for you to use, right now!
>
> It's taken a while, but I think I've figured out what's going on. MinGW
> isn't releasing builds of GCC 4.x yet because of the number of
> regressions, as discussed at
> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.user/21938>. That's why
> there are no stable builds of gfortran yet.
>
> MinGW offers downloads of older versions of GCC, including g77, at their
> downloads site: <http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml>. To tell you the
> truth, that download site was very hard to find, and when I was first
> there I found only the GCC 3.4.5 candidate builds. After some more
> searching, I found that the MinGW installer makes it easy to install GCC
> compilers. I just tried using MinGW-5.1.3 to download g77, and it seems
> to work. I'll try to let people know about this way of getting g77 so
> they don't need to keep using g77 version 2.95.
>
> It would have been great if someone could have just told me all this at
> first. Oh well, at least I know now. Is there anything else I should know?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
The focus of folks on this list is to maintain/develop gfortran. Thats why my
attention is going to figuring out how to make your example work correctly. g77
is no longer maintained, but definitely stable. gfortran is a Fortran 95
compiler. Stay tuned!
Jerry
More information about the Fortran
mailing list