[patch, fortran] PR32633 - bogus error with implicit SAVE

[Daniel Franke]

2007/7/6, Tobias Burnus <burnus@ph2.uni-koeln.de>:
> I think you missed the following in the new patch:
>
> >     case FL_PROCEDURE:
> > -      conf2 (save);
>
> >  	case PROC_DUMMY:
> > -	  conf2 (save);

Nope, both are there, i.e. both occurrences are are removed by the patch.


> Additionally, I miss a do-compile test case which fails currently and it
> fixed by this patch - just to make sure we will never regress on this
> again; the test case should go beyond the test case from PR32633.

Agreed, a save_parameter.f90, alongside save_common.f90 and
save_result.f90 should do?!

Thanks
     Daniel