[Fwd: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)]

[Tobias Burnus]

Hi,

Steven Bosscher wrote:
> I'd "hide" the features implemented by part 1 and 2 behind a flag,
> say, -fexperimental-features or whatever.
>   
I'm not sure that this is needed. As long as, e.g., "procedure, pointer"
gives an error message (possibly a better one than "syntax error"),
having "procedure" working without a flag is - in my opinion - sufficient.

Tobias