Makefile.in regeneration issue?

[Janne Blomqvist]

On 4/24/07, François-Xavier Coudert
<Francois-Xavier.Coudert@lcp.u-psud.fr> wrote:
> > In your recent commit for symbol versioning, the regenerated
> > Makefile.in has changes not relevant to what you changed in
> > Makefile.am (see below). The new file says "Makefile.in generated
> > by automake 1.9.6 from Makefile.am", but if I regenerate it again
> > with my automake-1.9.6 (without changing the Makefile.am), it makes
> > the reverse change :)
>
> Maybe I have an explanation: you used autoconf-2.60 while the version
> used in GCC is 2.59. I'll regenerate and commit with my next patch to
> the library.

Right, sorry about that. I downgraded my autoconf, regenerated and
committed as obvious.

-- 
Janne Blomqvist