Is GFortran stable enough to actually use?

[Christopher D. Rickett]

i did an svn update today and fixed the bug of mine that was causing 
char_result_11.f90 to fail, but now i'm seeing the following:

FAIL: gfortran.dg/spread_shape_1.f90 (test for excess errors)

this is the only unexpected failure i'm seeing.  this wasn't happening on 
friday, so i take it this is new?

Chris


On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Steve Kargl wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 04:29:07PM -0600, Christopher D. Rickett wrote:
> > are these the expected numbers?  it didn't fail on my tests, but it did 
> > fail on the following:
> > 
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_11.f90 (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr26246_1.f90 (test for excess errors)
> > ERROR: gfortran.dg/pr26246_1.f90: error executing dg-final: no files 
> > matched glob pattern "pr26246_1.f90.[0-9][0-9][0-9]t.original"
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_6.f90  (test for errors, line 8)
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_6.f90 (test for excess errors)
> > 
> 
> select_6.f90 failures are expected because an error message
> was changed, but the testcase wasn't updated.  You'll need
> to look in gfortran.log to see why char_result_11.f90 and
> /pr26246_1.f90 are failing.
> 
> If you have problems with writing Dejagnu testcases, you
> may want to contact Janis.  She seems to be the Dejagnu
> guru.  I don't have her email address handy, but a quick
> scan through the list archives shoudl reveal it.  Also,
> cc the list if you send her something.
> 
> -- 
> Steve
>