Automatic parallelization in 4.3?
Craig Powers
enigma@hal-pc.org
Tue Oct 24 07:05:00 GMT 2006
Brian Taylor wrote:
> I noticed that the GCC 4.3 projects page mentions plans for automatic
> parallelization of loops using the framework developed for OpenMP (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AutomaticParallelization ). I was wondering
> if there are any specific plans to support the Fortran 95 forall
> construct. These types of loops can be manually parallelized using
> the OpenMP "workshare" directive.
>
> Since all procedures within a forall construct must be pure (i.e. have
> no side effects), it seems like they should be easier to analyze and
> auto-parallelize than normal do loops. For similar reasons, the
> "where" statement might be another candidate for auto-parallelization.
>
> I found one post by Zdenek Dvorak regarding auto-parallelization, but
> it doesn't mention Fortran AFAICT. See
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg01243.html
>
> Any comments? I can post a request for enhancement on bugzilla if it
> would be useful.
One comment -- for my use of Fortran in a cluster environment, I
actually prefer to avoid use of additional processor cores because they
are controlled resources managed by the cluster's master scheduler. So
if I were to use gfortran to build my group's code, I would prefer to be
able to turn something like this off easily, preferably without
compromising other optimizations.
(It's not clear to me from glancing through the patch, as a casual user,
whether this is easy to turn off, independently of other options.)
More information about the Fortran
mailing list