wrong results for SPACING and RRSPACING at compile time
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Mon Oct 2 19:06:00 GMT 2006
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:15:35PM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> The following code
>
> real x, xd, xu
> x = -3.0*epsilon(x)
> xd = abs(fraction(x))*set_exponent(real(radix(x), kind=kind(x)), 1+digits(x))
> print *, -3.0*epsilon(1.0)-x
> print *, x, spacing(x), spacing(-3.0*epsilon(1.0))
> print *, x, xd, rrspacing(x), rrspacing(-3.0*epsilon(1.0))
> end
>
> gives
>
> 0.000000
> -3.5762787E-07 2.8421709E-14 5.6843419E-14
> -3.5762787E-07 1.2582912E+07 1.2582912E+07 6291456.
>
> where the last column of the two last lines computed from
> spacing(-3.0*epsilon(1.0)) and rrspacing(-3.0*epsilon(1.0))
> (hence the 'compile time' in the subject) do not match the
> values computed through a variable.
>
Dominique,
I've looked at this a little bit and I think I have the
the handling of subnormal numbers worked out. However,
I think gfortran's constant folding of spacing and rrspacing
may be broken for special cases. I need to go read the
standard for these intrinsics.
--
Steve
More information about the Fortran
mailing list