A latent IO bug

[Jerry DeLisle]

FX Coudert wrote:
>> I discovered this while testing Thomas subrecord patch when comparing 
>> with Ifort.  Ifort gives the appropriate error.
> 
> What is the status on Thomas' patch? Was it posted for review already? 
> (in that case, I missed it)
> 
> FX
> 
He posted a patch with the PR to start testing.  I have started testing and you 
will see some info in there. (pr29568)

BTW, the fix for this latent I/O thing is trivial.

Jerry