[patch, fortran] Fix PR 26769: transpose and reshape for real(kind=10), revert automake to 1.9.3

[Steve Kargl]

On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 09:51:35PM +0100, FX Coudert wrote:
> :REVIEWMAIL:
> 
> >>2006-03-23  Thomas Koenig  <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
> >>
> >>	PR fortran/26769
> >>	* iresolve.c (gfc_resolve_reshape):  Remove doubling of
> >>	kind for complex. For real(kind=10), call reshape_r10.
> >>	(gfc_resolve_transpose):  For real(kind=10), call
> >>	transpose_r10.
> 
> This approach of the problem (using same lib functions for all types) 
> has been annoying me for some time.
> 
> What happens on machines with a real(kind=16) but no integer(kind=16)? 
> On when we (though, to my knowledge, this second case doesn't exist 
> today) have a real(kind=10) and integer(kind=10) with different paddings 
> or other stuff?
> 
> I'd really think it would be much better having different routines for 
> real and integers. The cost for that isn't worth the price of worrying 
> about this kind of assumption every time we have a new real or integer 
> kind available, in my opinion.
> 
> Other than that, the patch is technically OK. So, while I think this 
> patch shouldn't be applied, if someone wants to tell me that I suck, the 
> patch will then be pre-approved! :)
> 

Thomas, I agree with FX that we should have separate integer
and real routines.  I think this can be a long range TODO.
So, I'll approve your patch, which I regression tested on
FreeBSD.

-- 
Steve