[PATCH][fortran] Rework allocator library interface

[Jack Howarth]

No problems here with a bootstrap of the current gcc trunk
and the proposed patch on i686-pc-linux-gnu. I get the following
results with a build on Fedora Core 6...

Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu

                === gfortran tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target.
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /home/howarth/src/gcc-4.3-20061212/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /home/howarth/src/gcc-4.3-20061212/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
Running /home/howarth/src/gcc-4.3-20061212/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/gomp.exp ...
Running /home/howarth/src/gcc-4.3-20061212/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect.exp ...
Running /home/howarth/src/gcc-4.3-20061212/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/compile/compile.exp ...
Running /home/howarth/src/gcc-4.3-20061212/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/execute.exp ...

                === gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes            15626
# of expected failures          7
# of unsupported tests          16
/home/howarth/src/linux_obj/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran  version 4.3.0 20061212 (experimental)


Perhaps you should try a clean svn pull or at least run 'svn diff' to make sure
you don't have additional changes in your gcc source tree.
                  Jack

On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:42:34PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 06:14:56PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> > 
> > Ok for mainline?  (4.2?)
> 
> Regression-test fails for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu:
> 
> Running /home/ig25/gcc/trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp ...
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90  -O0  scan-tree-dump-times free 10
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90  -O1  scan-tree-dump-times free 10
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90  -O2  scan-tree-dump-times free 10
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  scan-tree-dump-times free 10
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  scan-tree-dump-times free 10
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  scan-tree-dump-times free 10
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90  -O3 -g  scan-tree-dump-times free 10
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90  -Os  scan-tree-dump-times free 10
> 
> This is probably due to too new alias information making some calls
> to free redundant.
> 
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_section_1.f90  -O0  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_section_1.f90  -O1  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_section_1.f90  -O2  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_section_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_section_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_section_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_section_1.f90  -O3 -g  execution test
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_section_1.f90  -Os  execution test
> 
> A problem with a function with side effects here.
> 
> 	Thomas