Patch for PR29464

[Paul Thomas]

FX,
>
> For PR29464, I understand your eagerness to have it commited and also 
> agree that reviewing power is not very high these days (I'm partially 
> guilty for that) but I frankly don't think a patch 4 days old is 
> really something unacceptable :)  Since we've had a few regressions on 
> 4.2/4.3 recently (see Joost' recent meta-PR; his code used to build 
> perfectly fine, I use it for my day work!), maybe we should play a 
> little safer.
>
Is it a bit more mature now? :-)

I do agree that grousing at four days was a bit over the top.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01705.html


BTW Joost's version of CP2K can never have worked with gfortran, 
regressions not withstanding.

Paul