iostat

[Warren Turkal]

On Wednesday 23 August 2006 13:33, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I'm not opposed to giving information to a user.  I simply think
> that returning a vague iostat=errno value is only marginally better
> than the all inclusive 1 that is returned at the moment.  In fact,
> I've already stated that a documented non-standard iostat_to_msg()
> intrinsic subroutine could be a possible solution.

Vague is better than opaque.

wt
-- 
Warren Turkal, Research Associate III/Systems Administrator
Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Science