[gfortran,patch] -ffpe-trap library support for SysV

Steve Kargl sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Thu Oct 27 21:29:00 GMT 2005


On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:15:27PM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
> >I've bootstrapped and regression tested some version
> >of your -ffpe-trap patch on amd64-*-freebsd.  I didn't
> >see any problems; however, I was going to go over the
> >patch again after cvs is switched over to svn.
> 
> OK. I'll be happy to commit when you see fit.

Well, the switch to svn was scheduled for yesterday,
so I'm assuming that cvs/svn are some state of limbo.

> >BTW: did you see my last email about SIGNAL and ALARM?
> >After you fix the use of the removed must_be() function,
> >I think this is okay for mainline.
> 
> I did see your mail, and was still considering whether your meant it was 
> OK after I remove must_be() or if I had to submit it again. I will 
> commit when svn opens.
> 

For the record, I changed must_be() to 

   gfc_error (
       "'%s' argument of ALARM intrinsic at %L must be INTEGER or PROCEDURE",
	   gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[1], &handler->where);

to test your patch.

-- 
Steve



More information about the Fortran mailing list