[gfortran,patch] -ffpe-trap library support for SysV
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Thu Oct 27 21:29:00 GMT 2005
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:15:27PM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
> >I've bootstrapped and regression tested some version
> >of your -ffpe-trap patch on amd64-*-freebsd. I didn't
> >see any problems; however, I was going to go over the
> >patch again after cvs is switched over to svn.
>
> OK. I'll be happy to commit when you see fit.
Well, the switch to svn was scheduled for yesterday,
so I'm assuming that cvs/svn are some state of limbo.
> >BTW: did you see my last email about SIGNAL and ALARM?
> >After you fix the use of the removed must_be() function,
> >I think this is okay for mainline.
>
> I did see your mail, and was still considering whether your meant it was
> OK after I remove must_be() or if I had to submit it again. I will
> commit when svn opens.
>
For the record, I changed must_be() to
gfc_error (
"'%s' argument of ALARM intrinsic at %L must be INTEGER or PROCEDURE",
gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[1], &handler->where);
to test your patch.
--
Steve
More information about the Fortran
mailing list