[gomp] thread-safe libgfortran (fixes PR fortran/14943 and fortran/21647)

[Richard Henderson]

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:47:55PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> What's wrong with this?  There are different locks.

I mis-read, clearly.

> Ok for gomp?

As far as I'm concered, it's ok now, even if there are further
changes necessary.  There's no sense in carrying around a patch
this large...

> @@ -157,33 +130,33 @@ system_clock_8 (GFC_INTEGER_8 *count, GF
> +	  mx = GFC_INTEGER_4_HUGE;

Paste-o?



r~