PR 24207 may interest you

[Paul THOMAS]

Steve,

The condition needs to exclude use AND host association.

The patch below puts your case right without breaking anything.

I am unable to contemplate the formal arguments of a public procedure
at the moment - I am sitting with a PC on my lap in a conference.
However, I do not think that the condition there needs extending.

Best regards

Paul T

*** gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c.wrong     Wed Oct  5 10:43:32 2005
--- gcc/gcc/fortran/resolve.c   Thu Oct  6 09:29:36 2005
*************** resolve_symbol (gfc_symbol * sym)
*** 4330,4335 ****
--- 4330,4336 ----
        {
          if (arg->sym
                && arg->sym->ts.type == BT_DERIVED
+               && !arg->sym->ts.derived->attr.use_assoc
                && !gfc_check_access(arg->sym->ts.derived->attr.access,
                                     arg->sym->ts.derived->ns->default_access))
            {
*************** resolve_symbol (gfc_symbol * sym)
*** 4432,4438 ****
        {
          for (nl = sym->namelist; nl; nl = nl->next)
            {
!             if (!gfc_check_access(nl->sym->attr.access,
                                    nl->sym->ns->default_access))
                gfc_error ("PRIVATE symbol '%s' cannot be member of "
                           "PUBLIC namelist at %L", nl->sym->name,
--- 4433,4443 ----
        {
          for (nl = sym->namelist; nl; nl = nl->next)
            {
!             if (!nl->sym->attr.use_assoc
!                   &&
!                 !(sym->ns->parent == nl->sym->ns)
!                   &&
!                 !gfc_check_access(nl->sym->attr.access,
                                    nl->sym->ns->default_access))
                gfc_error ("PRIVATE symbol '%s' cannot be member of "
                           "PUBLIC namelist at %L", nl->sym->name,