do we expect compiler to catch this?

[Brooks Moses]

Tobias.Schlueter@Physik.Uni-Muenchen.DE wrote:
> This is a quality of implementation issue, not than a correctness issue.  It
> would be great if we caught this, but we don't have to.  On the other hand,
> with an explicit interface (as in the case of an intrinsic), we should probably
> catch this.  Which we don't:
> schluter@pcl247d:~/src> cat t.f90
> CALL f(1.)
> CONTAINS
> subroutine f(x)
>  intent(out) :: x
>  x = 2.
> end subroutine f
> end

That's an internal, not an intrinsic.  :)

(However, intrinsics, like internals, do have explicit interfaces.)

- Brooks