[RFC] PR fortran/20839
Steven Bosscher
stevenb@suse.de
Sun Nov 13 15:30:00 GMT 2005
Hi,
This should fix PR20839. But I don't like the diagnostic this way,
does anyone have suggestions for a more understandable message?
Gr.
Steven
PR fortran/20839
* parse.c (parse_do_block): Diagnose missing ENDDO statements
for named DO constructs.
Index: parse.c
===================================================================
--- parse.c (revision 106784)
+++ parse.c (working copy)
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street,
#include "config.h"
#include "system.h"
+#include "flags.h"
#include <setjmp.h>
#include "gfortran.h"
#include "match.h"
@@ -2057,6 +2058,14 @@ parse_do_block
break;
case ST_IMPLIED_ENDDO:
+ /* If the do-stmt of this DO construct has a do-construct-name,
+ the corresponding end-do must be an end-do-stmt (with a matching
+ name, but in that case we must have seen ST_ENDDO first).
+ We only complain about this in pedantic mode. */
+ if (pedantic && gfc_current_block () != NULL)
+ gfc_error_now
+ ("Named DO construct at %L has no matching named ENDDO statement",
+ &gfc_current_block()->declared_at);
break;
default:
More information about the Fortran
mailing list