[Patch, fortran] PR24518 and PR24520 - Improvements to MOD and

[Paul Thomas]

Tim,

>>
> On the first platform I tried (Cygwin on Centrino laptop), this 
> version of
> inline dot product gave me full performance at all lengths. For the
> non-vectorizable case (different strides on the 2 arrays), with 
> -funroll-loops,
> it performed significantly better than ifort.
>
It's a real tribute to Paul Brooks' work, isn't it?

Does your library improvement do better for any condition?

Did anybody try real(16)???  Whilst I believe that it will work but 
verification of this is the only thing that stands in the way of 
resubmitting the dot_product patch.

Best regards

Paul