[PATCH, libgfortran] Fix for PR24699, PR24700, PR24719]

Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle@verizon.net
Fri Nov 11 19:25:00 GMT 2005


Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> There are already other people looking at the patch, I just wanted to remind
> you that in previous discussion we had decided to give testcases more
> expressive names than some PR number.  The PR number should be in a comment in
> the testcase and in the commit message, which allows one to easily find the
> problem it was originally for.  An expressive name OTOH gives an easy means of
> quickly getting an idea what one might have broken.
> 
----------------------------------------
OT:  All NIST passes with flying colors.
----------------------------------------
Tobi, I will do this:

pr24699.f90 > fmt_t_2.f90

pr24584.f90 > namelist_empty.f90

pr24719.f90 > read_noadvance.f90

pr24785.f90 > read_x_eor.f90

pr24489.f90 > read_eor.f90

Jerry



More information about the Fortran mailing list