PR21480 is marked resolved but is not

Kamaraju Kusumanchi kamaraju@gmail.com
Wed Jun 8 04:15:00 GMT 2005


Hi
   Sometime back I reported PR21480

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21480

which is marked as duplicate of PR 21127 by Francois-Xavier Coudert

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21127

However on May 18th, a patch was committed which fixed PR21127. So I
thought this fixed 21480. But today I tried to compile the sample code
in PR21480 using

$gfortran-4.0 -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix
--program-suffix=-4.0 --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk
--enable-mpfr --disable-werror --enable-checking=release i486-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.1 20050522 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.0-9)

on Debian sid.

$gfortran-4.0 reshape_bug.f90
rajulocal@kusumanchi:~/work/fortran/gfortran_bugs 144  644 12:14 AM
$./a.out
 before
 (  0.000000    ,  0.000000    ) (  0.000000    ,  0.000000    )
 after
 (  0.000000    ,  0.000000    ) (  2.022255    ,  0.000000    )

So the patch introduced on May 18th fixed PR21127 but not PR21480.

So my questions are

1) Should PR21480 be reopened?
2) Has PR21480 been solved but the patch didnot make it to Debian?
3) any other ideas?

thanks
raju



More information about the Fortran mailing list