LAPACK failures
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Sun Jan 2 23:04:00 GMT 2005
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 01:40:38PM -0800, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> This is results using -O -pipe -g with:
>
> Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/opt/gfortran --enable-
> languages=c,f95Thread model: posix
> gcc version 4.0.0 20050101 (experimental)
>
>
> CST drivers: 1 out of 11664 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CBD: 1 out of 4085 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CGT: 764 out of 2694 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CGT drivers: 516 out of 2033 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CHE: 128 out of 1624 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CHE drivers: 94 out of 1072 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CHP: 124 out of 1404 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CHP drivers: 94 out of 1072 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CSY: 92 out of 1864 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CSY drivers: 72 out of 1240 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CSP: 84 out of 1620 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CSP drivers: 72 out of 1240 tests failed to pass the threshold
> CLS drivers: 2340 out of 65268 tests failed to pass the threshold
> DXV drivers: 200 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
> SXV drivers: 37 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
> SST: 1 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
> SST drivers: 1 out of 14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZXV drivers: 24 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZGG drivers: 1 out of 1273 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZHE: 128 out of 1624 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZHE drivers: 94 out of 1072 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZHP: 124 out of 1404 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZHP drivers: 94 out of 1072 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZSY: 73 out of 1864 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZSY drivers: 58 out of 1240 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZSP: 68 out of 1620 tests failed to pass the threshold
> ZSP drivers: 58 out of 1240 tests failed to pass the threshold
>
> This is quite a few more failures then before so it seems something
> broke. on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> Seems to be in the complex routines. Should I try to pull previous
> snapshots out of cvs to see when this may have happened?
>
Odd. Here's my FreeBSD results for i386-*freebsd6.0
kargl[210] grep -i fail *.out
csep.out: CST: 1 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
csep.out: CST: 2 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
dgd.out: DXV drivers: 200 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
sgd.out: SXV drivers: 37 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST: 1 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST drivers: 1 out of 14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZXV drivers: 24 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
kargl[211] gfortran --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.0 20050102 (experimental))
I also note that I can't even build gcc on my FreeBSD laptop.
The difference is the above is on an athon processor while
my laptop is pentium 4 M.
--
Steve
More information about the Fortran
mailing list