no joy with 20050723 gcc-4.1 snapshot

[Andrew Pinski]

> 
> I wrote:
> 
> > (if you are interested you, can have a look to the Fink mailing lists
> > couple months ago).
> 
> see for instance
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg18116.html

Yes this because you are using a static library which seems like had invalid
relocs in them anyways.  The new ld is doing the correct thing in warning/erroring
out.  The old ld was not erroring out because it was much stupider.

So this is not a bug in the new ld but the old as/ld.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski