severe deficiencies with integer(16), real(10), and real(16)

[Steve Kargl]

On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 10:45:21AM +0200, Fran?ois-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> > In every one of the switch statements that I've examined, I
> > find that we incorrectly handle integer(16) and/or real(10)
> > and/or real(16).  Some of these I think I can fix, but others
> > I'll need some input.  For example, do we have a BUILT_IN_TRUNCL.
> 
> My large kinds patch should fix those, no? I'm pretty sure i did
> myself grep for '\<8\>' in the front-end sources and added cases for
> each of those.
> 
> By the way, <tiny>if someone had time to review this large-kinds
> patch, it's been some time since its last modification.</tiny>
> 

Ok, I'll try to read over your patch.

-- 
Steve