[Patch, gfortran] PR16511 - Test 19990905-0.f fails with gfortran
Paul Thomas
paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr
Fri Aug 19 14:43:00 GMT 2005
Tobi,
>I think it would be even better to introduce an 'is_equivalenced' flag in the
>symbol_attribute structure, and set this in match_equivalence, exactly the same
>way this is done for in_common in match_common. You would then only have to
>scan the equivalences if oyu know that a symbol is equivalenced.
>
>
I wondered about doing this; I thought not to do it because this, I
think, is the only place that it would be used. However, it is not big
deal to make it so.... What say you?
>>+ continue;
>>
>>
> ^^^^^^^^ should be break;
>
>except for that this is ok.
>
>
>
Agreed - oops!
Cheers
aapaul
More information about the Fortran
mailing list