[Patch, gfortran] PR16511 - Test 19990905-0.f fails with gfortran

Paul Thomas paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr
Fri Aug 19 14:43:00 GMT 2005


Tobi,

>I think it would be even better to introduce an 'is_equivalenced' flag in the
>symbol_attribute structure, and set this in match_equivalence, exactly the same
>way this is done for in_common in match_common.  You would then only have to
>scan the equivalences if oyu know that a symbol is equivalenced.
>  
>
I wondered about doing this; I thought not to do it because this, I 
think, is the only place that it would be used.  However, it is not big 
deal to make it so.... What say you?

>>+ 			continue;
>>    
>>
>                        ^^^^^^^^ should be break;
>
>except for that this is ok.
>
>  
>
Agreed - oops!

Cheers

aapaul



More information about the Fortran mailing list