[Patch/fortran] Add documentation section about implemented F2003 features

[Steve Kargl]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 08:23:19AM -0700, Richard E Maine wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2005, at 11:43 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> 
> >So he thinks
> >that .f90 means the program is F90, looks at the man page and enables
> >the -std=f90 option. Well, what if the program in fact was F95 and the
> >programmer hasn't bothered to deallocate as he knows that the compiler
> >will take care of it (that's what I personally do, for example)? WWIII
> >again?
> 
> Nothing different at all will happen because a std=f90 option won't 
> affect allocatable treatment in that way. It would make no sense at all 
> for it to, and I seriously doubt that any compiler anywhere would do 
> that with a std=f90 option.
> 

This has been an interesting and enlightening thread.
I will however cast some reality into the discussion.
There isn't a -std=f90 option.

-- 
Steve