Spec 2005 and gfortran

[Toby White]

Thomas Koenig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:13:58PM +0100, Toby White wrote:
> 
> 
>>Don't know what the protocol for closing bugs is - should I 
>>close it myself as the submitter, or should it be closed by whoever 
>>committed the fix?
> 
> 
> Both are OK.  It might be worthwile adding a test case for your
> failure (if it was noticably different from the other bugs).

I've gone ahead & closed it. There's another, dependent, bug,
PR20663, which is also now fixed. I can't close that since
I wasn't the submitter.

The identifying feature of 20482 is that it
involved overloading an existing function, while 18108
only involved overloading user-written functions.

20663 involves a generic name for a user-written function
which happens to have the same name as a fortran statement.

>From the little I know of gfortran internals, I don't think 
these actually warrant a separate testcase, but it's easy 
enough to create one if anyone thinks it's worth it.

Toby

-- 
Dr. Toby White 
Dept. of Earth Sciences, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ. UK
Email: <tow21@cam.ac.uk>