gcc.pot regenerated

[Andreas Schwab]

"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk> writes:

> fortran/io.c seems to confuse xgettext (see the bogus source lines for the
> emtpy string at the top of gcc.pot), but I haven't investigated this
> further.

spec_error_string in po/exgettext scans source files for occurences of %e
followed by an error message in spec strings, but fortran/io.c does not
contain spec strings.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."