[gfortran] Make all labels DECL_ARTIFICIAL
Steven Bosscher
stevenb@suse.de
Mon Dec 20 23:13:00 GMT 2004
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:10, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Monday 20 December 2004 21:23, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > There is absolutely nothing we gain from making Fortran's numeric
> > labels user labels (gdb can't put break points on them), and they
> > for some reason hurt performance. So the attached patch just all
> > marks them as compiler-generated. Thoughts?
>
> It'd be nice if we could figure out what "some reason" was,
We believed at the time that it would be useful to be able to set
a breakpoint on __label_#####.
> and/or why gdb
> won't set breakpoints on these labels.
It will, but users who try, say "b 100" will put a breakpoint on
line 100, not label 100. I wouldn't expect people to remember to
put a breakpoint on __label_00100.
> Last time I brought this up I was
> told that user labels should not effect the optimizers.
You were told wrong. At -O1 they're always preserved, which prevents
some merging of basic blocks. At the tree level it appears we never
remove user labels (there's a separate patch from from Andrew Pinski
to fix that).
> IMHO labels should
> not affect code quality, and this is an optimizer bug.
Yup.
Gr.
Steven
More information about the Fortran
mailing list