[PATCH V3] New version of proc whole and dependencies

[Jose E. Marchesi]

> Excellent!  I have moved my git-fu from "total loser" to "loser", that's a
> big milestone for me :-)
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 2:32 PM Jose E. Marchesi <jemarch@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Chris.
>>
>> This is looking good! :)
>>
>> We will need some tests added to gcc/gcc/testsuite/algol68/execute, in
>> files like whole-1.a68, whole-2.a68, ...
>>
>> For example:
>>
>>
>> whole-1.a68
>>
>>
>>  if bits_width = 32
>>  then assert(whole(max_int,0) = "4294967296");
>>       ...
>>  elif bits_width = 64
>>  then assert(whole(max_int,0) = "18446744073709551616");
>>       ...
>>  fi
>
> Your numbers above are unsigned 32 and 64 bit.
>
> Ok.  I will also test bits_width = 16 and bits_width = 8.
>
> As well,  in each bits_width interval, I propose to test:
>
> -max_int
> -max_int - 1
> 0 (zero)
> and 1000 random numbers in the range -max_int - 1 .. max_int
> which I will pre-compute in "another programming language".
>
> Of course the long long, long, short and short short versions as well
> (for short short I will test 100 random numbers)
>
> How does this sound?

Sounds great, thank you.

I would also make sure to include the particular values for which the RR
implementation produces different strings than printf, due to the
different semantics of MOD.

Thanks!