[PATCH] Update directions for sending Algol 68 patches

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Thu, 18 Dec 2025, Pietro Monteiro wrote:
> They should be sent to both the Algol 68 list and gcc-patches.

Makes sense.

> Suggested-by: Mohammad-Reza Nabipoor <mnabipoor@gnu.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pietro Monteiro <pietro@sociotechnical.xyz>

For changes like these, that update existing Algol 68 material or add 
relevant updates to other pleses, feel free to push and just share on 
gcc-patches. This is just an offer, not a request - I am happy to review 
and approve anything wwwdocs.

For wwwdocs changes, would you mind adding [wwwdocs] to the mail subject 
per our conventions? This makes them stand out for people interested (and 
indeed I do have filters).

>    end of GCC, and the corresponding runtime library.  Patches to ga68
> -  and libga68 should go to this list.</li>
> +  and libga68 should be sent to both this list and <b>gcc-patches</b>.</li>

Looks good, thank you.

I have, over the years, read and been told to prefer active tense in 
technical documentation. If you agree, you could rephrase this as "Send 
patches for ga68 and libga68 to both this list and <b>gcc-patches</b>" or 
similar.

(This is not a requirement; the patch is fine either way.)

Gerald