This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Deque fiil/copy/move/copy_backward/move_backward/equal overloads

From: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
To: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:40:57 +0200
Subject: Re: Deque fiil/copy/move/copy_backward/move_backward/equal overloads
References: <9357e741-9a71-6783-2ce9-24ba8a3939ba@gmail.com>

Ping ?

On 6/19/19 7:32 PM, François Dumont wrote:

I wanted to implement Debug overloads for those already existingoverloads but then realized that those algos could be generalized.This way we will benefit from the memmove replacement when operatingwith C array or std::array or std::vector iterators.
I might do the same for lexicographical_compare one day.
The ChangeLog below is quite huge so I attached it. I wonder if Icould use deque::iterator and deque::const_iterator in place of the_Deque_iterator<> to reduce it ?
Tested under Linux x86_64 normal and debug modes, ok to commit ?

François

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]