This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fix Bug 83566 - cyl_bessel_j returns wrong result for x>1000 for high orders


On 05/01/2018 23:46, Michele Pezzutti wrote:
+ __term *= (__k == 0) ? _Tp(1) : -(__mu - (2 * __k - 1) * (2 * __k - 1))
+                        / (__k * __8x);
In such cases, per the Coding Standards, you want an outer level of parentheses wrapping the whole right side expression. See toward the end of I see that many other places will need fixing, at some point - this rather straightforward rule is often overlooked leading to brittle formatting of many expressions, probably because it's really obvious in practice only together with Emacs, I'm not sure.

Also - this kind of stylistic nitpicking is partially personal taste - the parentheses around (__k == 0) seem definitely redundant to me, and I don't think you would find many examples of that in our code.

About the Assignement, please be patient. For example, used to be the case that when RMS was traveling couldn't process Assignments, for example. It can be slow for many reasons, it's 100% normal.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]