Re: xml/manual/debug_mode.xml reference to Namespace Association

[François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>]

    I would just get rid of the part about g++ extension which seems to 
be obsolete or, if not already, will soon be. We just need to keep the 
part about C++11 inline namespace even if in g++ it is not limited to C++11.

    Something like:

  <para>Achieving link- and run-time coexistence is not a trivial
    implementation task. To achieve this goal we leverage on the C++11
    inline namespace extended in GNU C++ to previous modes, and a
    complex organization of debug- and release-modes. The end result
    is that we have achieved per-use recompilation but have had to
    give up some checking of the <code>std::basic_string</code> class
    template (namely, safe iterators).
  </para>


François


On 01/03/2017 14:45, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I found that xml/manual/debug_mode.xml has a reference to the
> following http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Namespace-Association.html
> in
>
>    <para>Achieving link- and run-time coexistence is not a trivial
>      implementation task. To achieve this goal we required a small
>      extension to the GNU C++ compiler (since incorporated into the C++11
>      language specification, described in the GCC Manual for the C++ language as
>      <link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
>      xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Namespace-Association.html#Namespace-Association";>namespace
>      association</link>), and a complex organization of debug- and
>      release-modes. The end result is that we have achieved per-use
>      recompilation but have had to give up some checking of the
>      <code>std::basic_string</code> class template (namely, safe
>      iterators).
>    </para>
>
> That link is broken, and I could not find any suitable replacement
> in the GCC documentation.
>
> Any hints?  Suggestions how to go about this?  (Perhaps simply omit
> the first half of that sentence?)
>
> Gerald