This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [libstdc++, testsuite] Add dg-require-thread-fence
- From: Christophe Lyon <christophe dot lyon at linaro dot org>
- To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at arm dot com>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:58:42 +0100
- Subject: Re: [libstdc++, testsuite] Add dg-require-thread-fence
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAKdteObWfMso8e5R_eE=q=_ROD7nkmKphVM1=-zk_J1j+As3LA@mail.gmail.com> <20161020094008.GB2922@redhat.com> <CAKdteObZBtji1Yc+aEH0JHQRX2HcrgePrVTGUApzAmqPEiTM6A@mail.gmail.com> <20161020122040.GI2922@redhat.com> <A7E1F0A3-E50E-4A8E-BE67-15FA61633C6B@comcast.net> <20161020163417.GL2922@redhat.com> <CAKdteOYAwyeo9xWV8ji+J_Lh-TS2KS71z1eeLvVjLN91EK090w@mail.gmail.com> <341FEC7E-6E51-4EFC-AD91-D4B708DC7011@comcast.net>
On 14 November 2016 at 18:54, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:00 AM, Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> So if we say that the current behaviour has to keep being the default,
>> so that users think about what they are really doing,
>
> Having a toolchain not work by default to force users to think, isn't a winning strategy.
>
> Everything should always, just work. Those things that don't, we should fix.
>
I tend to agree :-)
Maybe Ramana changed his mind and would now no longer want to force
users to think?