This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [WIP] Support C++11 <cuchar>
- From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net>
- Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:42:22 +0100
- Subject: Re: [WIP] Support C++11 <cuchar>
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <13095466 dot 1991385 dot 1385074710036 dot JavaMail dot root at vznit170146> <CAH6eHdRkSDKNF9Jgv-WSysnv2-Jh7thTrU40FgFPKrU1FDDwrw at mail dot gmail dot com> <555C9A19 dot 2020002 at verizon dot net>
On 20 May 2015 at 15:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> I would like to finish it off.
> I would rather not install a broken header. That's the one thnig that made
> me feel bad about my original patch.
> If I run into trouble I'll ask - I'm weak on auto* stuff.
Great, let me know if I can help. My auto-fu is also weak but
improving recently :-)
> Ed
>
> P.S. Do you know what the committee thought about special functions?
> It looked like they said No.
It was contentious, but we're going to revisit it at the next meeting,
so the proposal isn't dead yet.
> I want to put them in per TR29124 in either case.
Yes, I think we should do that. The functions should only be declared
when the user defines a particular macro, so there is no problem with
unconditionally polluting namespace std when users include <cmath>,
because they'll only get the TR29124 stuff if they ask for it.