This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: niter_base simplification

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
To: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:18:15 +0100
Subject: Re: niter_base simplification
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <5538003D dot 30905 at gmail dot com> <20150427115515 dot GG3618 at redhat dot com> <5541EA9A dot 1010803 at gmail dot com>

On 30/04/15 10:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote:

On 27/04/2015 13:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

(Alternatively, could the same simplification be made for
__miter_base? Do we need _Miter_base<> or just two overloads of
__miter_base()?)


Definitely, I already have a patch for that.


Great :-)

It might be simpler to just add __make_reverse_iterator for >= 201103L
and then always use std::__make_reverse_iterator instead of a macro.

That's similar to what we do for std:__addressof and std:addressof.

Ok, attached is the patch I have plan to commit then that I am testingat the moment.


Looks good, OK for trunk assuming the tests pass.

Thanks!

References:
- niter_base simplification
  - From: FranÃois Dumont
- Re: niter_base simplification
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: niter_base simplification
  - From: François Dumont

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]