This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch ping] libstdc++ testsuite cxxflags

On 19/05/14 14:57 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 05/17/2014 04:07 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17 May 2014 10:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17 May 2014 01:16, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
It appears that this patch from last fall never got reviewed.

Can someone take a look?  I'll commit the patch on Cesar's behalf if it's

Libstdc++ patches need to go to the libstdc++ list, which this did, in
a separate mail that broke the threading:
Then archives's inability to thread betweem months broke it again:

I approved it then withdrew that approval:
then the patch got revised:

I'll have to refresh my memory about it.

Whoops, I totally missed that there was already a separate thread on the libstdc++ mailing list only. My bad. :-(

I think I'm happiest with the second version of the patch, in

It does mean a change that might affect people using CXXFLAGS when
running the tests, so we might want to update where it says
"Or, just run the testsuites with CXXFLAGS set to -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG or

I came up with the attached patch for the wording change. I'm having trouble regenerating the HTML version of the manual, though; it looks like I have a different version of the DocBook stylesheets around that are introducing lots of extraneous changes, and I'm not sure what the "right" version is. :-S Any suggestions?

You always get hundreds of changes, DocBook generates unique numeric
id attributes, which are different every run. Don't worr yabout the
docs, I can sort them out. If you and Cesar are happy with the patch
in then please
go ahead and commit that version, thanks.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]